Ivan Shmakov wrote:

        A few months ago, the ``Basic HTML'' interface of Google Mail
        was changed so that it now uses constructs like:

Whilst Google are only noted for their clean user interfaces, not their ability to write HTML, this is particularly bad.

<td>
<b>From Who</b>...</td>

Looks like it should have been th (semantic error).

<td>
<a href="?v=c&th=hexnumber">

There is no &th; entity in HTML. This would abort in real XHTML and is relying on error recovery in HTML.

<div><font size=1><font color=#006633>
As noted, plus inline absolute sizes and element that has been deprecated for the best part of a decade.

Inbox
</font></font>
<b>On something</b>

Physical us of b.

</div>
</a></td>


--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.


_______________________________________________
Lynx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev

Reply via email to