On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Martin Sæta <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > Is it possible to get lynx to remove the content in alt and title tags in > images?
Adjust lynx.cfg or Options for the user to change how they are displayed on the page. Set images to "ignore". > i.e. substitute img src=x.jpg alt="xyz" title="xyz" to img src=x.jpg alt="" > title="" > use shell or perl for post processing > Or is it possible to remove alt and title tag in image-tags completely? > again if this is a scripted crawl using a wrapper to pre-process URLs and a block of code to post-process the returned html is a standard technique. > I'm using lynx to dump the content of web-pages for text search, and want > nothing but the text in the web-page. > > Thanks. > > Regards Martin Saeta > CTO Scan4news.com > > > > > > -----Opprinnelig melding----- > Fra: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] På vegne av Y P > Sendt: 21. januar 2009 09:41 > Til: David Woolley > Emne: Re: [Lynx-dev] urg: looking for statically linked binary of lynx, > please help! > > Thanx anyway, > will look after other static bins (elinks, links2). > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:38:07PM +0000, David Woolley wrote: >> Y P wrote: >> >Hi: >> > >> >On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 08:07:49AM +0000, David Woolley wrote: >> >>Seems to me that you can use a dynamically linked version, as long as >> >>you have an appropriate LDLIBRARYPATH. >> > >> >I don't know ! I'm webmaster, not the server-admin. I don't know so much >> >about rpm-based sysstems, I don't use such myself at home. >> >> LDLIBRARYPATH has nothing to do with RPMs. Its fundamental to Unix >> shared libraries. >> >> >> > >> >>Even if there wwe some reason >> >>why you couldn't have shared objects, you could static link private >> >>libraries and dynamic link system ones. >> > >> >The system doesn't authorizes to have a personalized .htaccess for > Apache, >> >and so more, so I won't ask them what -except paying enough for >> >> .htaccess has nothing to do with whether you use .so or .a libraries. >> >> >> Generally though, I doubt that there is a sufficient demand for static >> linked versions of Lynx, for anyone to have one available for download >> for your platform. >> >> >> -- >> David Woolley >> Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. >> RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, >> that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. > -- > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 : > Micro$oft has a majority market share in the new desktop PC marketplace. > This is a bug, which Ubuntu is designed to fix ! > http://www.ubuntu.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Lynx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lynx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev > -- Stefan --- Stefan Caunter 905 517 0702 1 877 484 8637 x705 Skype: stefan.caunter http://search-optimization.ca _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
