On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 08:09:49PM -0400, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > 2) rev=made implies that the email address was made by the page, rel=made or > rev=made by would be better
I disagree and assert that rel=made would imply that the current document made the email address. Which really just goes to show that it's not possible to infer meaning from the word "made" itself without reference to some standard. It's defined, sort of, in HTML 3.2: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html32#link as a way of documenting existing practice. HTML 2 doesn't define the possible link relationships at all, and there is no HTML 1 spec, but I remember in the very early days that HTML tutorials used to recommend putting <link rev=made> near the top of the document. HTML 4 silently dropped rev=made, and HTML 5 has dropped rev altogether, creating a new rel=author link type to replace rev=made as it was the only significant use case of the rev attribute. See: http://blog.whatwg.org/the-road-to-html-5-link-relations#rel-author imc _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
