On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 04:06:59PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Stefan Caunter wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >>> Keith Bowes dixit: >>> >>>> Time to move Lynx to SourceForge or somewhere else that has a good >>>> uptime? >>> >>> *laugh* *cough* >>> >>> //mirabilos >>> -- >> >> Exactly. Surely we jest. >> >> Several inquiries to this list in the last few years have treated lynx >> as if it is a SourceForge project anyway; why encourage this? >> >> Besides, SourceForge is full of advertising. And other things. >> >> I'd much rather be associated with ISC software. > > What's wrong with http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lynx/ ?
a) sure it's "nongnu", but off/on there's been comments that projects that are not-GPL3 aren't as appreciated as those which are. I don't recall if this came up for discussion for lynx or vile. b) Savannah (recalling incidents) has its own problems with break-ins and downtime. Noting that we're not actually discussing whether lynx.isc.org is itself down (rather the discussion was prompted by a user who was having problems). -- Thomas E. Dickey <[email protected]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
