Je 2012-Feb-05 je 20:02, David Dorward skribis: > > The webpage is, unfortunately, written in such a way that it depends on > JavaScript (instead of using progressive enhancement[1]). Lynx doesn't > support JavaScript Also, it doesn't work with JavaScript disabled, so it's not just a problem with text browsers. Isn't it good style to make checks on the server side and just use client-side code for redundancy?
> I vaguely recall a discussion a while ago that suggested the architecture of > Lynx didn't lend itself to adding JS support (or rather, DOM support which > most in-browser JS depends on). According to the documentation, it can be built with experimental JS support, but I've never tried it. _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
