On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:35:57PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dixi quod… > > >But it’ll probably fix the RedHat issue as well. > > OK, I looked at that and the source in detail. > > I looked at every match of HTList_removeObject in the source. > All those not in src/LYCookie.c are almost certainly safe. > > Those remaining in src/LYCookie.c other than what I fixed > yesternight seem to be safe as well. I looked especially > at those “HTList_removeObject(de->cookie_list, co);” calls, > but since there’s a “break” after, and the loop variable > is not used afterwards any more, they are probably safe. > > The occurrences in other files are surprisingly different > from src/LYCookie.c and in that consistent. This looks as > if src/LYCookie.c was written by someone else, or rather > two someones (those using while are easier to check to be > safe than the for ones).
cookies were added later than most of the code using HTList, and reworked more than once. I'll take a look (thanks). -- Thomas E. Dickey <[email protected]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
