On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 08:37:55PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:46:49AM -0800, [email protected] wrote: > > >> For the unconditional wrapping - I suppose it's possible that lynx is > > >> confused about the width of the terminal. If it were only kterm (and > > >> not also the Windows port), I'd check if you have disabled the auto-wrap > > >> feature (which kterm, being based on xterm, I think would apply). > > > > > > It doesn't depend on the terminal, I got the same results with kterm, > > > xterm and gnome-terminal. > > > I think lynx isn't confused about the width of the terminal because long > > > line consist of plural words is wrapped as expected. > > > The problem occurs with long line consist of single word. > > Perhaps (your change actually shows differently when I test it). > But I want to be able to reproduce the problem: > > a) the dev.10 patch did not affect widths except in > (which does not appear to be related to your test-case): > > * add a limit-check in case colspan is given as zero for > non-nested-table case > (report by Sami Liedes) -TD
hmm - I was quoting 2.8.9dev.10 here (but for the rest, the problem still is that I want to see how your terminal is setup to eliminate wrapping). -- Thomas E. Dickey <[email protected]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
