> nytimes.com, washingtonpost.com, newyorker.com (and many others) rely > on users' browsers to keep track of the pages they have accessed so > as to limit use. Although lynx keeps cookies, it doesn't run the > script (or whatever it is) that these sites use, thus one can browse > them without limit.
And? I'm not sure whether you're citing this as a feature, a bug, or what. Relying on the client to do _anything_ merely because the server asks it to, though, is stupid design. (Unless, I suppose, you don't really much care and are satisfied with "it works in most cases", which may be good enough here.) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list Lynx-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
