On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 05:23:23PM -0500, David Niklas wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 06:40:10 -0500 > dic...@his.com wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 01:17:55AM -0500, David Niklas wrote: > > > On Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 18:31:18 -0800 > > > Michael Selik <mse...@suplari.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I was wondering where the correct place is to report a bug with the > > > > conda-forge lynx recipe (https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/lynx). It > > > > forced a downgrade of Python and broke other packages I had > > > > installed. Luckily, fixed on uninstall, which is a credit to conda. > > > > Any tips on where to report? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- Mike > > > > > > > > > > Hey Mike, > > > The lynx on conda was last updated 1 year and 7 months ago. I'd say > > > that the package is outdated. As for the bug report, I don't see a > > > package maintainer on the site. Unless the person is here and reading > > > your email I doubt that you'd be able to find the person. > > > You might try whatever MLs and forums that the conda folks provide in > > > hopes of getting the package removed, or updated. You might find the > > > person you're looking for over there. > > > Just in case I was not clear, the lynx devs cannot be responsible for > > > package management unless they are a maintainer of that package. Even > > > then, this is not a lynx bug and does not belong here; it belongs on > > > the report facilities of the packaging system or where such a system > > > directs you to for bug reports in packaging. > > > > agreed - from the description of the site, I guessed that it's > > rpm-based, but didn't see in a quick check where the source-scripts for > > that might be available. With a little more checking, all I see is > > python - and those add-on things generally aren't designed to work with > > existing package systems. Without some way to download the package > > files independently of the conda install, there's no way to do any > > useful analysis though. > > > > After noticing that a lot of the mail we get here is only indirectly > related to lynx (the spamassassin team has the same problem), I decided > to try to alleviate the burden on you (and any other devs), by replying > to as many of them as I'm first to see. > Then you reply anyway... > Not that I'm upset but if I am replying with a correct response why do > you also feel the need to respond?
I was agreeing, but pointing out that I didn't see a way that I _could_ help, since I found nothing helpful on the conda website. -- Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> https://invisible-island.net ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list Lynx-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev