> Majordomo uses <listname>-owner, for the default envelope address
Sure, for the envelope address, use whatever you want. $LIST-owner, $LIST-bounces, $LIST-bounces=$ENCODED_RECIPIENT, whatever. If anything, I'd say this is an argument _against_ using -owner for the "contact a human" address, because, in most cases, I think it would be stupid to use the same address for list mail envelope-from and for contacting the listowner. Routine bounce processing should not bother a human - or, at least, if I were running a list with automated software I wouldn't want routine bounces to land in my mailbox. > and only suggests <listname>-request, not request-<listname>, So? I think this is the first time anyone has said anything about -request addresses. And -request _is_ standardized (well, actually, -REQUEST, but most mail software case-folds local-parts); see RFC 2142 section 6, probably among others. > although it does suggest defining both <listname>-owner and > owner-<listname>. Probably good advice...and only tangentially relevant to the question at issue here. I have no problem with listowners supporting multiple addresses for contacting the listowner. $LIST-owner, admin-$LIST, $LIST-riarthooir, whatever you want...as long as owner-$LIST still works. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list Lynx-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
