David Woolley dixit: >> Tell them it requires ECMAscript and therefore violates basic >> accessibility principles. > > Unfortunately, the W3C web accessibility initiative hasn't taken that position
They’re not everyone. You know how many lynx users cannot evade to something else with ECMAscript support who are active on this mailing list, alone. Plus, the BSI (German IT security ministry) is also forbidden from turning on JS ☻ or at least were in 2018 or so, but this probably hasn’t changed. > (My take on this is that WCAG membership is mainly accessibility > consultants, and consultants need solutions that are acceptable to > businesses, or they will be out of business themselves.) Unsurprisingly. > I actually note the OP wanted an accessible way of using YouTube. I No, this is a different thread. bye, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r
