KIHARA Hideto dixit: >Reverting following change solves the problem.
>- strcat(linedata, p); >+ for (i = 0; (linedata[i] = p[i]) != '\0'; ++i) ; The lower line is a strcpy inlined, not a strcat, so probably a bogus refactor… (that being said, I’d prefer if new code used either strlcat, if the lengths are unknown/unchecked (but linedata is NUL-terminated before the call) or memcpy (if the lengths are known, e.g. because the target was allocated at the right size)) Meow, //mirabilos -- 15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)
