On 2022-12-30 23:42, Karen Lewellen wrote: > While I generally have few issues accessing WordPress created > sites, at least the one I have encountered, that does not necessarily > translate to the tool itself.
If I understand correctly, I believe you're talking about the accessibility of the admin/authoring portions of Wordpress which is independent of the accessibility of the resulting site published using Wordpress. > Anyone successfully use WordPress with Lynx? It's been a while since I've played with an install. If the admin/authoring panel isn't accessible from lynx (which might well be the case since there was a major shift a while back in the content-editor widget, changing from a more straightforward text entry box to a rich-edit box), there's "wp-cli" (https://wp-cli.org/) utility which lets you manage just about every aspect of a Wordpress install from the command-line, including posting and comment management. That said, unless I *have* to use Wordpress for something, I generally prefer using a static site generator (SSG) to maintain my personal sites. I use a combination of Nikola (https://getnikola.com/) and a custom SSG that I wrote for my own uses depending on which site. But there are lots of others like Hugo or Jekyll. Big advantages include: - everything is local - the generation process just creates an "output/" folder that you can copy up to your server however you want (whether FTP, rsync, scp, or some web GUI) - there's nothing dynamic on the server that could be exploited/hacked since it's all just text files - the resulting pages are FAST even on a ridiculously underpowered VPS instance or shared-hosting box Anyways, just a collection of my random thoughts & ramblings. -tim
