991121 Thomas Dickey wrote re userdefs.h: > I was pointing out that you may not have read the latest version > before making a patch. that's true, but it appears i couldn't have checked that file alone, as the distribution site has been disabled for a couple of weeks ... anyway, i hope you will use the more explicit advice to users in my patch. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: T.E.Dickey