On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
>
> > Hello, Klaus.
> >
> > I was automatically unsubscribed from lynx-dev a week ago (seems my ISP was
> > down at night, and lynx-dev is very sensitive to subscriber's unavailability),
> > and I forgot about lynx-dev completely (the was a long silence there). I sent
> > request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] hours ago, and there is no answer. Is lynx-dev
> > still open for subscriptions? Also I sent some reply from flora archives,
> > and they didn't arrive. What's wrong?
>
> Maybe it has something to do with this message:
> <http://www.flora.org/lynx-dev/html/month1199/msg00250.html>
May be. Anyway, today I subscribed to lynx-dev without any problems -
replies from majordomo came almost immediately.
> [ ... ]
>
> > As for rendering tables - why don't you lynx-devers consider the algorithms
> > w3m uses?
>
> Why don't *you* lynx-dever (again I hope) consider it?
I still consider myself as lynx-dever (and I'm ready to fix bugs in the code
I submitted). As I remember, I announced my willing to implement algorithm for
table rendering as in w3m on lynx-dev (as asked for some funding in that
message). I think I will have time to start doing it in February.
> I'm sure w3m has a fine algorithm. I think none of us lynx-devers has
> studied it.
Yes, it has fine algorithm (and it's similiar to algorithms NS, MSIE and
others use as I guess). IMO we should use it too.
> > And another (crazy) idea - it can make sense to hack mozilla for
> > console use (it saves tables as text, so it has some renderer for this) - this
> > will also bring support for java and javascripts.
>
> Fine ideas. Somebody has to do it or it remains an idea.
Yes...
> > May be forwarding message to lynx-dev will make sense too. Could you do
> > this, please?
>
> Klaus
>
PS: you cc'd your reply to lynx-dev. Seems it didn't arrive to lynx-dev
flora archives yet.
Best regards,
-Vlad
