lynx-dev i.e. nits

[Klaus Weide]

In noticed Tom seems to replace all (or many?) occurrences of "i.e."
with "i.e.," in some automated fashion.  This doesn't seem right to
me, in general.  Possibly similar for "e.g.".  Why not just leave
them alone as whoever wrote them wrote them.

And then there are occurrences of "i.e. " being replaced by "i.e.  ",
i.e. the dot is treaded like the end of a sentence...

   Klaus