On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
>
> > __Henry:
> > > > I also am very much opposed to allowing the Visited Page posting (writing
> > > > to disk) privileges.
> >
> > Vlad:
> > > I see this as useless feature too (but I'd like to be able to have much more
> > > bookmark files than 26, so I won't have to invent one-letter association for
> > > bookmark files. Having implemented ability for adding (and probably
> > > deleting) links to/from arbitrary files will allow user to save favorite links
> > > from his/her session to some file - IMO 95% of links in the V.L. page would be
> > > useless for user, and will allow nice aid for thorough categorization of
> > > links).
> >
> > What are you talking about? What does the Visited Links Page have
> > to do with bookmarks?
>
> I started talking about extended bookmark support (even more extended than
> present in current versions of lynx) because I think that user don't need
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> entire VLP to be saved, ability to have arbitrary number of bookmark files
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No-one was talking about that in this thread, AFAIK.
> could allow the user to save only selected links to some bookmark file
> (in case categories of all 26 other bookmark files don't match ones the user
> wishes to). Probably that was offtopic (or subject of the message should be
> changed).
Highly confusing.
Klaus
