On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Henry Nelson wrote:

> > I can't understand why you wrote "it is best done outside of Lynx".
> 
> It's the "Lynx way," as I see it.  A lynx, as you know, is a small
> wild cat.  We tend to associate the characteristics of lighting speed
> and elusiveness with that animal.  As we continue to load up Lynx
> with functions peripheral to a client's access and use of Web resources,
> such as proxying and word processing, it begins to look more and more
> like an over-fed tabby.

I see your (and probably lynx-dev's) general thought.
But I can't understand the individual functions which should be 
inside of Lynx or outside of it.
Are you saying processing 1-byte kana should be outside of Lynx?
Is this right?
--
Takeshi Hataguchi
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to