>
> Dear Sir or Madam:
> When are we going to drop Lynx 2.8.tweak.fudge.jumper and get lynx-windows 4.0 or
>so?!
When you submit reliable, supportable, changes to the code. As you can't
even make your mail program create compliant (~70 character) lines,
I think that might take some time.
Note that the code should not greatly increase the size of the executable.
My guess is that most Lynx developers think that there is a point where
people who want non-commercial browsers for Windows are better off using
browsers designed as GUI browsers, like Amaya or Mozilla.
> I mean, DECSystem20 had PTYCON, and that was more than 2 decades ago in the
>mid'70's! PTYCON was "pseudo-teletype-controller" which operated like an advanced
>windows3.1<control-escape>task-window: it inserted message-alerts from the other
>tasks, and popped-up its connection-controller on ^X (that's control-X) and showed
>you the status of pseudo-terminal task/job/connection-numbers. Where's lynx-windows
>4.0? Simple javascript (no text-dimming, but window.open, etc., yes), and
>https-secure links, and multi-tasks, (split-frames would be interesting if available,
>but not the necessity), copy-paste-insert-lines of selected text into textarea/input
>boxes, status-bar alerts [or pop-up box alerts] ... all the simple features we've
>come to expect in a 4.0 browser. [Lynx-Gold 4.0 anyone?]
