> > Again, why? Are you thinking about directories, or regular files, > > or both? > On Tue, 9 May 100, T.E.Dickey wrote: > umask applies to both Yes, I know; that's the problem. What (still) I don't understand is why you think "With Unix permissions set up as they are, that's got to be an error." So I speculated you might have thought only about directories. > actually it's an unusual condition (I don't recall many other applications > that have to circumvent broken umask's). I don't call it broken - it's just unexpected. A program that fails in obscure ways when faced with unexpected input is broken. Klaus ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Michael Abraham Shulman
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh prob... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems T.E.Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.3 with nmh problems Henry Nelson