On Thu, 25 May 2000, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2000, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > It's ugly, it's overhead, it's system-dependent.
>
> Of course. And in the worst case the script will be 60K big.
>
> But seems there is an even better approach - why don't do all customizations
> only once in the script like lynx-setup, that will ask user for something
> (probably) and modify lynx.cfg and user's .lynxrc (too bad we have to do it
> for each user, or provide hacks to share default .lynxrc that lynx will use
> when called). What do you think about this?
I already pointed Atsuhito Kohda to
<http://surfchem0.riken.go.jp/~kubota/linuxwork/language-env.html>
<http://packages.debian.org/language-env>
(or he already knew about it). Have a look at it.
I think he should add ad module for lynx to it.
But that's very Debian-specific. And there are probably good reasons
why that machanism hasn't widely caught on (even within Debian, it seems).
It only supports 4 or so languages. It does too many things, and
different ones for each of them.
Klaus
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Atsuhito Kohda
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx should respect LANG pAb-032871
- lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lynx should... Michael Warner
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re: lyn... pAb-032871
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? (was Re:... pAb-032871
- lynx-dev Re: Is Lynx still practical? Michael Warner
- Re: lynx-dev Re: Is Lynx still practi... David Woolley
- lynx-dev Convewrting PDF to text ... Michael Warner
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? Donald Rober
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Is Lynx still practical? Duncan Simpson
