On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, David Woolley wrote:
> According to recent press articles, British Telecom have just discovered
> that they have a US patent on hyperlinks and are intending to try to
> get royalties from US ISPs.
>
> I don't know the scope of the patent, but if it covers browsers, and they
> choose to demand royalties on, even just commercial, use in browsers,
> the Lynx licence to re-distribute would become void (GPL clause 7).
Not so fast. Some company's _demand_ cannot possibly void the licence
to distribute lynx. In clause 7, the GPL says: "For example, if a patent
_license_ would not permit royalty-free redistribution [...], then [...]
refrain entirely from distribution [...]." (emphasis added)
You gotta accept a license first, in order to then have a conflict that
would prevent you from distributing lynx.
Klaus
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
