> That is the "magic" I was talking about. BUT, don't slack off; your
> "problem [IS NOT REALLY] solved," as I am sure Tom will point out to
> you. Slang is just covering up the gap between what your physical
In that case my problem has two possible solutions:
1) I can find an existing terminfo entry for the Telix Vt102 emulation.
2) I can locate a Vt100 emulator which does a better job of
emulating the VT100 control set and is a better fit for the exitsing
terminfo entries.
3) I can write an accurate terminfo entry for the
Telix VT102 emulation.
I will try solutions 1 and 2 since I do not know the details of the Telix
emulation. So...
New questions...
Is anyone on this list using Telix with VT102 and if so, which
terminfo entry are they using? I tried every vt100* in the terminfo/v/
directory without success.
Can anyone suggest a DOS terminal package which supports vt100/vt102 emulation
better than Telix's?
My terminfo manpage seemed to make it all the way through. I sckipped to
the end to learn about the associated tools (tic, infocmp, etc).
> terminal can really do and what you are telling your curses library
> that it can do. (The problem is: you can count the number of people
> worldwide who can write an accurate terminfo entry on your fingers.
> Does the terminfo(5) man page still die halfway through?)
>
> __Henry
>
> ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
