I've been meaning to ask ... ... aside from the obvious "because nobody's coded it" answer, is there any reason why there's no reverse search function? Yes, I know that a forward search "wraps", but that is often a PITA to get where I want to go. Is anybody else interested in this, or is it just me? If there's some interest, I'll look into adding it (sorry, no Javascript insights ATT :-) ). /kim ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Kim DeVaughn
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search pg
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Kim DeVaughn
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search David Combs
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Vlad Harchev
- Re: lynx-dev reverse search Kim DeVaughn
