On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Philip Webb wrote: > BTW in the theological debate, i tend to support DK, > on the usual ground that we have little influence over sites out there, > so Lynx should be given shock absorbers to handle bad ones; > if necessary, such choices can be made user-defined options. The "shock absorbers" are already there, the user can already 'd' instead of 'Enter', and thereby force retrieval in binary mode, and then do whatever he/she likes with the 'd'ownloaded file. The patch doesn't enable a new way to fix a given broken situation, it just tries to do automatically what the user can do anyway (and hides the problem). (If I have mischaracterized the patch, please correct). Klaus ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Mike Castle
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c pg
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Wesley Morgan
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Wesley Morgan
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Doug Kaufman
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev Revised patch for HTFTP.c Duncan Simpson