In a recent note, Thomas Dickey said:
> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 20:56:32 -0400
>
> I don't see that the ru.po is worse than the next file - several characters
> in the 0xa0-0xff range. Perhaps zip uses some threshold (or are you using
> the large unbundled ru.po - I'm only reading the 1293-character stub)?
>
pg@sanitas:139$ ls -l lynx2-8-4/po/ru.po
-rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 1299 Sep 13 1999 lynx2-8-4/po/ru.po
pg@sanitas:140$ wc lynx2-8-4/po/ru.po
39 144 1299 lynx2-8-4/po/ru.po
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
