On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:28:46PM -0800, Rob Cameron wrote:
> I think there is still one remaining problem in the restrictions
> table of LYUtils.c: the boolean values of some "can" fields need
> to be negated. A value of TRUE for this field for a particular
> restriction would mean that the restriction is set to false by the
> line
> *(restrictions[i].flag) = !restrictions[i].can;
> when the "default" or anonymous restrictions are set. But in each
I noted that the table shows the (pre)existing behavior - and in theory tend
to agree with your assessment, but am curious if anyone who is using it
in anonymous mode can explain why those items are set that way.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
