On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Duke Normandin wrote:
>You got _that_ right! Like I said in another post, I'd be willing to lend
>a hand in whatever way I can. There's simply no reason why 'Links' and
>'w3m' should even exist with 'Lynx' around. LynxII or LynxME has a nice
>sound to it -- what do you think? ;^)

They exist primarily because they view tables and many web pages better,
which is exactly what you're looking for.

But *TO* view them better, they have to do two passes through the data,
which takes longer.

So what do you want, speed or very nicely rendered (in text) sites?
It's a tradeoff..  Usually I use lynx first for the sites I know work
well, but for some sites (e.g. gist.com) I use links..  (and I've actually
got iCab running on some other sites.. so at work I *do* use GUI browsers
too..)


; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to