*** [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in the Lynx list today: :) A source page converter would be missing user input. A converter is still necessary, there are two moments when you need conversion, one when displaying for the first time (for example to display the submit buttom of a form), or when activating a link or submitting a form (and other cases too if you know of any). A converter should be able to deal with both cases, and should only be activated when needed. I do completely support the idea of adding a converter, even if it can not deal with everything. Incomplete Javascript support is much better no Javascript support at all. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to html Conver... Martin McCormick
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Thomas Dickey
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... edmondrod
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Eduardo Chappa
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... edmondrod
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Duncan Simpson
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Rob Partington
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Eduardo Chappa
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... David Woolley
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript t... Eduardo Chappa
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Larry W. Virden
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... Eduardo Chappa
- Re: lynx-dev Thinking of a Possible Javascript to ht... David Woolley
