On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:53:16PM +0100, clemensF wrote: > > Philip Webb: > > > in some important areas, it probably isn't modular enough, > > but it would help everyone to make it so. > > i've got a question here: is the libwww-FM/2.14 something like w3c's > libwww? is this code set apart from lynx with a clean api?
no - it's an older version (roughly similar design, but each has lots of fixes that are not reflected in the other). In addition to fixes, a number of changes have been made to make it work with lynx. So converting to w3c's libwww would be interesting for someone to work on for several months... -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
