[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > would probably do well on many sites if it could only follow > relative links without getting confused.
Lynx is perfectly happy with relative links; I don't think your concept of relative links agrees with that of the URLs RFC. If Lynx is to be bugwise compatible in its handling of some broken format, you need to precisely specify the syntax and semantics of that format. ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
