On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 02:37:29PM +0200, Serge Munhoven wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 06:51:38AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Ian Collier wrote: > [...] > > > > > > RFC2616: > > > > > > The Content-Location entity-header field MAY be used to supply the > > ^^^ > > It doesn't sound as if there's a requirement for lynx to interpret it, then. > > Perhaps the other browsers simply ignore it. > > > But a few lines later RFC2616 says: > > The value of Content-Location also defines the base URI for the > entity.
(I'm on Linux now, will see if IE and NS6 agree with Opera/w3m/links, later ;-) > (cf.: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.14) > > Maybe this can be overridden by an explicit > <base href="http://www.srsb.org.uk/";> in the <head> of the document. maybe - but there is none. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
