Clemens Fischer wrote: > > so "patch -l" doesn't work here? the man page says it would match > > any sequence of white space to any sequence of said ...
Thomas Dickey replied: > It will apply the changes - but it doesn't guess that well about filenames that > are transformed to MS-DOS format. That's probably what BL was talking about. No, actually I just wasn't aware of that flag. It would still be better if the patch came through intact -- I assume `patch -l` can't "fix" the TABs in the patch, so the resulting patched source is going to have a weird mixture of expanded and un-expanded TABs... >Bela< ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
