Bela Lubkin wrote: > (I've deliberately obfuscated the above email addresses by > changing '-' to '@')
> By archiving these addresses into the list, we can now be > sure that spammers will harvest them, and the overall spam > density in the archives will increase. :-( Too late. Do a search for both on Google. > Many mailing list archives have established a practice where > _all_ email addresses in the archive are obfuscated, to > frustrate spam list harvesters. What I notice was proposed: http://www.flora.org/lynx-dev/html/month022002/msg00068.html > Of course this is also frustrating to legitimate users of the > archive. Because they can't contact who wrote a certain e-mail ? Another advantage of Savannah: http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2003-03/msg00158.html "reply via email to" -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], dyndns.org} ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
