On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 03:47:26PM -0300, Fr�d�ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Webb wrote: > > > 030928 Fr�d�ric L. W. Meunier wrote: > > > it's probably a good thing for the Windows builds, > > > where the bzip2 executable isn't available > > > > surely, that's incorrect: have a look at www.bzip2.org/ . > > earlier this year, i introduced one of the baron's slaves to > > Bzip2, when i had to send a large file compressed to get > > thro' his e-mail gate. > > Sorry for the confusion. What I tried to mean is that most > Windows users don't have bzip2 installed. Linking against > libbz2 (not as a DLL) would solve it. > > It's the same if you don't link with zlib. Most Windows users > don't have gzip installed.
well, it's still on my list. I haven't looked at the patch carefully, but my concern would be if it relies on particular features of a library whose interface isn't stable. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
