On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Stef Caunter wrote: > Semantically, version numbering is what it is. > > Nevertheless, there is a perception of progress associated > with it that is subjective. I think those close to lynx find > the progress apparent and clear when it happens -- I'm one > of them. > > I don't pretend to know who might not find the progress so > apparent, but I would not ignore that possibility.
I don't see how a versioning numbering could change things like http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-12/msg00334.html Maybe releasing often. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html ; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
