>>>>> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: >> > Asger> Does an inset really need to know the owner of itself? >> [buffer] > > It is needed in some cases. >> >> When? Allan> Every inset with an associated popup needs to know which buffer Allan> it belongs to so the popup can talk to it (eg. get/set data). Allan> I haven't given much thought to removing this requirement but I Allan> am certainly open to suggestions. Allan> The inset only needs to know its owner to make the GUI work not Allan> for any other reason that I can think of other than my limited Allan> signal stuff. It seems to me that currently the include inset needs to know about its parent to work correctly. To make this change, we'd have to pass extra information in some cases. JMarc
- Re: Fun = Signals + B... Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: Fun = Signals + B... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + B... Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Inse... John Weiss
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + ... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffe... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffe... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffe... John Weiss
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Inse... Allan Rae
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffe... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + ... Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffe... Allan Rae
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Inse... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + ... Lars Gullik Bj�nnes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffe... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Fun = Signals + Buffers + Insets Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
