On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Amir Karger wrote: > How come aastex isn't mentioned though? Mike might get offended that the > physicists are considered more important than the astro-folk. I submitted AASTeX just after 1.0.3, so it has been forgotten. Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is a serious deficiency in LyX for use with AASTeX, and thus the AASTeX stuff is more of a toy than a real paper writing tool (sorry guys). I hate telling people "Yeah, LyX is great for writing astronomical manuscripts, but you still have to do citations by hand because LyX only knows about \cite." If the citation stuff were "fixed", I would be generating e-mail to the AAS in Washington, DC, and asking them to officially sanction LyX for use in writing papers. I just don't feel right about doing this in its current configuration. Perhaps I should play Imperious American Capitalist Pig and offer a monetary reward for the implementation of such a feature ... Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
