On 04-Feb-2000 Allan Rae wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
>> On 3 Feb 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> [...]
>> > | modern C++ which means it is not the most portable thing in the
>> > | world.
>> >
>> > Perfect for LyX then.
>>
>> But you want to maintain compatibility with gcc 2.7.2? My library uses
>> exceptions, rtti, template specilation amoung other things.
>
> I'm working on adding libsigc++ which means we can kiss 2.7.2 goodbye.
> Libsigc++ would probably be as restrictive as aspell given its heavy use
> of templates.
>
Well we kissed goodbye to gcc 2.7.2.x with the first 1.1.x release, if
it's for that!
Greets Jürgen
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel: +39-0471-450260
I-39100 Bozen Fax: +39-0471-450296
ITALY Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
If I'm over the hill, why is it I don't recall ever being on top?
-- Jerry Muscha
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
