On 10 Feb 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | You should maybe update the rae branch wrt the main one. It will be > | more painful if you wait too much. > > Very true. Now that cvs is working again I will be able to. > So you should decide wheter you want to update against head before or > after painter commit or after painter cleanup. Did you happen to tag before you committed? Otherwise I'll just merge the lot and try to keep current with that. Allan. (ARRae)
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Juergen Vigna
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Allan Rae
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Allan Rae
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Juergen Vigna
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Juergen Vigna
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Allan Rae
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Allan Rae
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Allan Rae
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: rae branch compile woes. Lars Gullik Bjønnes