Larry Marso wrote:
>
> No. But they're obviously bringing together widely divergent tools
> for an "integrated" studio solution. Tell me this really makes
> sense, from a writer's point of view? I doubt it.
>
It only makes sense for a "shooting script." The original writer is
rarely involved there except where you see "Written, Directed, and ...
by (e.g. Clint Eastwood)." I guess I will have to download and install
it. It is unlikely that we would want to go much further than I have,
but if their system gains acceptance in the industry, it, like the IBM
selectric typewriter before it, will alter the standards. I just don't
want LyX to look backward.
Garst
