On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:32:35PM +0200, Andre Pönitz wrote: > Just keeping it in does not come for free, and there's no technical > reason not to use Qt4. Qt4 is more widely available than and almost > uniformly > better across the whole range.
Except on Solaris. Using Qt 4.1.4 I don't obtain antialiased fonts and the icons have an ugly aspect, too. It's even worse than xforms with scaled bitmaps. I don't know why it is so. In Qt3, the xft library was used, but this is no longer the case with Qt4, which probably relies on fontconfig, which, in turn, is not up to date on Solaris (my speculation). The net result is that Qt4 on Solaris is *much* worse than Qt3. -- Enrico
