Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Michael Gerz wrote:
| > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| >> IMHO we should not merge translations from 1.4 at all. (or at most on
| >> a case by case basis. And if translators want it (I don't want it for
| >> NB f.ex.), msgmerge can be used for this.)
| >>
| > Lars, I am a careful man :-)
| >
| > Right now, I am checking the state of the 1.4 and 1.5 translations
| > on a case-by-case basis. If the 1.4 translations are better (for
| > many languages they are significantly better!), I will remerge.
| > Otherwise, I won't.
| >
| > I will put nb.po on my black list.
| Any particular problem with nb.po? Helge Hafting
No. Only that it is missing translations and have a few fuzzy entries.
I am working slowly on them help would be appreciated.
--
Lgb
