Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I thought we had already agreed two monthes ago where the line was.
Bo> The exact problem is that the line moves. When I had trouble with
Bo> processes a few months ago, QProcess was out of the question.
Bo> I do agree with Georg that we should not touch existing code if
Bo> they are not broken (since it is tempting to replace the process
Bo> stuff with QProcess), and GUII should be kept. However, new stuff
Bo> like Xml may take advantage of now-in-support qt support.
Bo> Do we all agree on the following?
Bo> 1. GUII should be kept. (No QtGui beyond frontend/qt4)
Yes.
Bo> 2. Existing code should not be converted to Qt... unless a bug is
Bo> found.
Yes.
Bo> 3. none GUI Qt functions can be used for new features.
Well, only when it is very clear that there is no reasonable
alternative (via boost for example).
*AGREED*!!!
That's just wonderful, everybody is agreeing with everybody!
Abdel.
