>>>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> No the question is to understand _why_ a reference causes a problem
>> there. My understanding was that it was because the argument to
>> \section is a moving argument, and I thus propose to just \protect
>> the \ref. Now Uwe tells us that both Herbert and the hyperref
>> author (who are better LaTeXnicians than I am) say \ref should not
>> be in \section, but we still do not know why, and this does not
>> allow us to make a precise list of the commands that are or are not
>> problematic.

Abdelrazak> Are we going to spend another 4 years trying to understand
Abdelrazak> LateX internals?

This bug is only one year old, actually. I did propose a (trivial)
fix, but Uwe objected that it was not how it should be done. Then
nothing happened.

Abdelrazak> This bug has been stagnant for how many years? 

Look by yourself, and note that at the time it was understood as a
conflict with babel/hungarian.

JMarc

Reply via email to