On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:32:04PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:12:39PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > > >> Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:33:56PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> what do you see when you have large icons (right click on toolbar and > >>>> select big-sized icons)? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Doh! I would say "Elementary, Watson!". You're right, there's no mistery. > >>> Qt 4.1 truncates the icons, Qt 4.2 resizes them and this produces the > >>> horrible looking on Solaris. I think that three icon sizes are needed... > >>> > >>> > >> This has been mentioned before. So what sizes are needed? It'd take but > >> a minute to write a script that would generate them all reasonably nicely. > >> > > > > This has also been discussed and the script solution was discarded. > > It is better to do a manual conversion such that you can decide what is > > better to do case by case. > > > But surely you could run the script and then have a look at what you > had, re-doing by hand those that needed to be redone by hand. It'd at > least be worth investigating, if no-one has yet tried it. Of course, > someone may and have found it disastrous operating on such small images.
Yes, of course. However, as regards the symbols displayed in mathed, my idea would be to let a rasterizer do the work and then taking a snapshot of the result. -- Enrico
