>>>>> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>> "uwestoehr" == uwestoehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: uwestoehr> Author: uwestoehr Date: Mon Apr 23 20:46:27 2007 New uwestoehr> Revision: 17925 uwestoehr> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17925 Log: Announce: uwestoehr> Don't promise things we don't properly support. (see bug uwestoehr> 2339) Jean-Marc> Please revert. We _do_ support optional arguments for Jean-Marc> environments (which is not the subject of 2339). To correct myself (I misread the bug, sorry): we did add support for optional arguments to environments at the same level as they are supported for macros. This is what this entry said. To go back to the bug itself: What you ask for in the bug report is an elaborate way of doing ERT. I do not see the usefulness of this. Either we offer real transparent support, or we keep it simple. In the example given in comment #9, you can be sure that people will wonder how they can add option "foo" for only some of the paragraphs, but not all, which will defeat the purpose of your nicely crafted layout file. So I agree that we need to do something, but I still do not know what. I tend to think that we will not have a good answer until we can add python code in the layout files. (And besides, macros with all kind of perverse syntax are a pain). JMarc
