On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:55:39PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote: > >Actually CMake use the glob approach and, > > Been there, have given up because I would like to avoid incorrect > build that might be introduced by unclean source tree. > > scons has been very resilient during this rename mass. As long as > scons_manifest.py is up to date, it always builds correctly. No > autogen.sh, no configure, no make clean.
So what's the status of scons and cmake now? Is either able to replace autotools right now or are there still some targets working with autotools only? Andre'
