Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Stefan Schimanski wrote: >> Am 11.05.2007 um 14:24 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes: >>> Stefan Schimanski wrote: >>>> I work on a better implementation of math macros for some time now. >>>> Accidently I was playing around with some screencast tools and made >>>> a demonstration of the current state of the system: >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68Gys4rp3u4 >>>> Make the video fullscreen to see what's going on. Mainly it shows >>>> the design choice how math macros look to the user, like the >>>> possibility to fold/unfold, add and removing parameters greedily >>>> and non-greedily, and the flexibility coming from position >>>> awareness of the macro definitions, including support for master >>>> documents. >>> That's a bit complicated at first glance but it sure looks >>> *impressive*. >> What exactly is complicated? > Yes, all of that gives the feeling of complicatedness ;-) I think it probably seems complicated the way anything powerful is complicated. This can obviously be used to do about a billion things. But wow, it looks amazing. I hereby volunteer to help test it. I'd love to be able to use this in my own work. (I was the one who filed the "child docs" bug.)
Richard -- ================================================================== Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://frege.brown.edu/heck/ ================================================================== Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
