José, I'd like to apply this patch. I agree with Jean-Marc that this whole bibitem handling is a mess (and the patch is thus not really nice), but it seems we're not gonna find anything better for 1.5 (see discussion on bugzilla).
OK? Jürgen Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758 > > This patch addresses this bug in form of some rather ugly additional > checks: if a bibitem is deleted, the paragraph will be merged with the > preceeding par, if that's a bibitem par as well, else it will be reset to > default. > > Furthermore, it is checked that bibitem do not occur outside pos 0. > > The ideal solution, instead of all these checks, would be to set the > bibitem in the margin (like the itemize item) and thus disallow the cursor > being placed in front of it. However, I think this is post-1.5.0 stuff, and > my solution would do for now. > > However, please cast your eye on the paragraph merging code in > handleBibitem(). I wouldn't be surprised if this could be optimized. > > Thanks, > Jürgen
